We were wrong. It was too soon. They criminalized knowledge. Now what?

Humor, Injustice, Pics & Video, Wikileaks

Why Whistle-Blowers Must be Opaque

Often, a picture is worth 1000 arguments.

4 Comments

  1. teeater

    …there is a quotation, from Kurt Tucholsky. It’s actually a title of one of his articles (Tucholsky was a Journalist, poet, book reviews, cabarét texts and novel author. A critical Jew, an extremely brilliant head, btw. some of his quotatoins are absolutely alive and used widely, in German, like the “Soldaten sind Mörder” quotation (soldiers are killers), some of the people using the quotation don’t even know the roots of this quotation, but anyway – his work is highly valued. Of course – everywhere else than e.g. in universities or at least in German language/literature faculties, at least at those of so-called “elite” universities ones.

    Anyway. Tucholsky once wrote this article called “Ein Bild sagt mehr als 1000 Worte” (a picture sais more than 1000 words). He was highly interested in photography, in the photography’s early time, when it still was on its way to play a role in print media. (But – as mentioned, he wrote reviews, too. Not only book reviews, he also enjoyed to visit e.g. exhibitions – so, there are some interesting reviews of photography exhibitions, photography as arts – paris – just like the need of them for documentary needs, like in organisations’ exhibitions, for example – some of them he saw in berlin, talking about the 200ies…)

    Anyway – yes. But still… I think it might be possible to both – a) mediate the reasons for needed rejection of too curious, self-forgetting journalists’ questoins and b) to discuss the mentioned article (hitting, as we think, the dart board but not really the center of it due to some reasons) using language as medium, too.

    There is a beginning of it, in German language, maybe a page visitor is interested to join the talk:

    http://tinyurl.com/3833drl

  2. teeater

    (typo corrected version – you can delete the 1st, the the visitors won’t get confused. oh, btw re typo correction – there’s still this diplomatic typo in the acc, have ya seen it?…)

    …there is a quotation, from Kurt Tucholsky. It’s actually a title of one of his articles (Tucholsky was a Journalist, poet, book reviews, cabarét texts, and novel author. A critical Jew, an extremely brilliant head, btw. Some of his quotations are absolutely alive and used widely, in German, like the “Soldaten sind Mörder” quotation (soldiers are killers), some of the people using the quotation don’t even know the roots of this quotation (which turned from a quote to a slogan as time went by), but anyway – his work is highly valued. Of course – everywhere else than e.g. in universities or at least at German language / German literature faculties, at least at those of so-called “elite” universities.

    Anyway. Tucholsky once wrote this article called “Ein Bild sagt mehr als 1000 Worte” (a picture sais more than 1000 words). He was highly interested in photography, in the photography’s early time, when it still was on its way to playi a role in print media. (But – as mentioned, he wrote reviews, too. Not only book reviews, he also enjoyed visiting e.g. exhibitions – so, there are some interesting reviews of photography exhibitions, photography as arts – Paris – just like the need of them for documentary needs, like in organisations’ exhibitions, for example – some of them he saw in berlin, talking about the 200ies…).

    Anyway – yes. But still… I think it might be possible to both – a) to mediate the reasons for needed rejection of too curious, self-forgetting journalists’ questoins and b) to discuss the mentioned article (hitting, as we think, the dart board but not really the center of it due to some reasons), to discuss them using language as medium, too.

    There is a beginning of it, in German language, maybe a page visitor is interested to join the talk:

    http://tinyurl.com/3833drl

  3. teeater

    (man, wtf… 3rd typo corrected version – you can delete the 1st and 2nd, so the visitors get less confused. oh, btw re typo correction – there’s still this diplomatic typo in the acc, have ya seen it?…)

    …there is a quotation, from Kurt Tucholsky. It’s actually a title of one of his articles (Tucholsky was a Journalist, poet, book reviews, cabarét texts, and novel author. A critical Jew, an extremely brilliant head, btw. Some of his quotations are absolutely alive and used widely, in German, like the “Soldaten sind Mörder” quotation (soldiers are killers), some of the people using the quotation don’t even know the roots of this quotation (which turned from a quote to a slogan as time went by), but anyway – his work is highly valued. Of course – everywhere else than e.g. in universities or at least at German language / German literature faculties, at least at those of so-called “elite” universities.

    Anyway. Tucholsky once wrote this article called “Ein Bild sagt mehr als 1000 Worte” (a picture sais more than 1000 words). He was highly interested in photography, in the photography’s early time, when it still was on its way to playi a role in print media. (But – as mentioned, he wrote reviews, too. Not only book reviews, he also enjoyed visiting e.g. exhibitions – so, there are some interesting reviews of photography exhibitions, photography as arts – Paris – just like the need of them for documentary needs, like in organisations’ exhibitions, for example – some of them he saw in berlin, talking about the 200ies…).

    Anyway – yes. But still… I think it might be possible to both – a) to mediate the reasons for needed rejection of too curious, self-forgetting journalists’ questoins and b) to discuss the mentioned article (hitting, as we think, the dart board but not really the center of it due to some reasons), to discuss them using language as medium, too.

    There is a beginning of it, in German language, maybe a page visitor is interested to join the talk:

    http://tinyurl.com/3833drl

  4. teeater

    (ok, right now no chance to get the typo-versions 1 and 2 deleted, maybe later the mod has time for this.)

    anyway, right now there seem to be some voices worrying about WL’s new trend to taking part in information hierarchy, turning away from its own PR and own announced aims.

    so – paid previews. infodealer for established media instead of egality of access to information

    plus and via

    self-made dependance of established money. web community founding given up for newspapers’ dollars [“given up” meaning re focus of own effort – what do you prefer to depend on…]

    the dicussion is lead in german, but whoever interested:

    click

Leave a Reply